Personal injury claims in Scotland involve a unique set of legal principles, and contributory negligence is a crucial factor that can significantly impact the outcome of your personal injury case. Understanding how contributory negligence is interpreted and applied is essential for both pursuers and defenders.
In Scotland, contributory negligence is governed by the law of delict, which encompasses the rules and principles related to personal injury claims under civil law. Contributory negligence is recognised as a defense that allows the Court to apportion blame between the parties involved based on their respective levels of fault.
For contributory negligence to be established in a personal injury claim, the defender (the party being sued) must demonstrate that the pursuer (the injured party) failed to exercise reasonable care for their own safety, and this failure played a role in causing the accident and injury. The pursuer's actions are assessed in light of what a reasonable person would have done in similar circumstances.
In personal injury claims, the claimant must prove the defendant was responsible for their injury, while the defendant has the burden of proving contributory negligence. To prove contributory negligence, they must demonstrate the following:
In cases where contributory negligence is successfully argued, the court will deduct a percentage of the compensation that the defendant is ordered to pay the claimant.
The defendant is required to provide evidence in support of any contributory negligence allegations, and propose a percentage split in liability. The pursuer solicitor then reviews and assesses this evidence and advises their client on whether they think the contributory negligence allegations will succeed. If they do think these allegations will succeed, they will advise whether the proposed split is reasonable, or if a lower percentage split should be put forward.
If the parties to a claim where there is an allegation of contributory negligence cannot agree, a judge at court will review the evidence and decide what (if any) split in liability is appropriate.
If the court finds contributory negligence on the part of the pursuer, they may apportion liability between the pursuer and the defender. This means that both parties are assigned a percentage of fault based on their respective contributions to the incident. The pursuer's compensation is then reduced by the percentage of fault attributed to them. This can be discussed and negotiated between parties or argued before the Court. In most cases, the matter is resolved without recourse to appearance in court.
Contributory negligence in Scotland is determined on a case-by-case basis, considering the specific facts and circumstances surrounding the incident. The court considers factors such as the actions of both parties, the foreseeability of the risks involved, and whether the pursuer took reasonable steps to protect themselves. Other matters such as whether protection was available to the pursuer.
In personal injury cases in Scotland, legal representation is vital for both pursuers and defenders. Lawyers play a key role in presenting evidence and arguments to support or challenge claims of contributory negligence. Effective legal strategies involve demonstrating the reasonableness of the pursuer's actions or, conversely, highlighting their negligence.
In certain cases, statutory regulations may also impact the assessment of contributory negligence in Scotland. For example, if an individual is injured in a workplace accident, health and safety regulations may influence the court's determination of liability.
Contributory negligence is a nuanced aspect of personal injury claims in Scotland, requiring a thorough understanding of the legal framework and precedents. We would recommend that you always seek legal guidance when making a personal injury claim to allow your best position to be represented.
Let's consider a hypothetical example to illustrate contributory negligence in a personal injury claim:
Scenario: John and Rose are involved in a car accident at an intersection of road in Glasgow, Scotland. John, the pursuer (injured party), alleges that Rose, the defender (party being sued), was responsible for the collision. However, Rose claims that John's actions also contributed to the accident
Facts: The traffic light at the intersection was red for Rose, and she came to a complete stop.
When the light turned orange going in to green, Rose proceeded through the intersection.
Simultaneously, John, who was approaching the intersection from a side street, failed to yield the right of way and entered the intersection understanding the lights to not yet be green for Rose.
The two vehicles collided, resulting in injuries to John.
In this scenario, the court would assess the actions of both parties to determine whether contributory negligence played a role in the accident.
Rose: The court may find that Rose had the right of way when the traffic light turned green, and she proceeded lawfully. However, the court could examine whether Rose was driving at a reasonable speed and paying adequate attention to her surroundings. This would most likely be done through expert opinion and witness evidence.
John: The court would assess whether John failed to yield the right of way, potentially acting negligently by entering the intersection without ensuring it was safe to do so. The court might consider factors such as John's speed, visibility, and awareness of the traffic signal.
If the court finds that both parties share some degree of fault, contributory negligence may come into play. For example, if the court determines that John was 30% at fault for failing to yield, and Rose was 70% at fault for not exercising sufficient caution, it would apportion liability accordingly.
Assuming John's damages are calculated at £10,000, his compensation would be reduced by his percentage of fault. In this case, John would receive £7,000 (70% of £10,000), reflecting the apportionment of liability based on contributory negligence.
This example illustrates how contributory negligence operates in a personal injury claim, highlighting the importance of the court's assessment of each party's actions and the potential impact on the final compensation awarded to the injured party.
Connect with a Speir Buchan expert today
